.... Se qualcuno si stesse chiedendo perché esiste il codice 307 quando c'è il 302 che sembra avere medesima
semantica, il tutto è spiegato qui (cito la stessa fonte di prima):
Note: RFC 1945 and RFC 2068 specify that the
client is not allowed
to change the method on the redirected request. However, most
existing user agent implementations treat 302 as if it were a 303
response, performing a GET on the Location field-value regardless
of the original request method. The status codes 303 and 307 have
been added for
servers that wish to make unambiguously clear which
kind of reaction is expected of the client.
